Case studies/Unum Design System
Design SystemsAtomic DesignFigma Migration
Case Study No. 03

From scattered PDFs to a single source of truth.

A four-month migration from static PDFs and Adobe XD files into a robust, component-based, token-driven library in Figma. The hardest part was not the tooling. It was the people.

Unum design system hero composite — color tokens, components, and card patterns
Role
Lead Designer
Design system contributor
Team
2 Designers
1 Developer · 1 PM
Tools
Figma
Migrated from Adobe XD
Timeline
4 months
2022 to 2023
1
Source of truth for the entire org. No more "where is the latest logo?" Slack messages.
0
Manual redlines required after migration. Figma Dev Mode replaced specs documents.
6
Component categories fully documented with usage notes inside the components themselves.
4
Adoption barriers identified and solved through working sessions and developer evangelism.
The challenge

A 175-year-old company, legacy tooling, and no shared vocabulary.

"Where is the latest logo?" was a Slack message we got every week.

The problem

Our design assets were decentralized.

Updates made to the "master PDF" didn't automatically propagate to working files in Adobe XD. Designers and developers were working from sources of truth that drifted further apart every week.

The friction

Designers were reinventing the wheel.

  • Common elements like buttons and cards were rebuilt every time.
  • Developer handoff was messy because XD specs were manual.
  • We lacked a shared vocabulary between design and code.
The stakes

Inconsistencies were plaguing our product.

Simple updates took days because changes had to be made in twenty places. The system had become a bottleneck against shipping the work.

The goal

Not just a tooling change. A culture change.

Create a dynamic, living library in Figma that uses modern features (Auto Layout, Variants, Variables) to speed up workflow and ensure 100% consistency.

But the real goal was harder. We needed designers, developers, and stakeholders all working from the same source of truth. We needed them to actually want to use it.

The methodology

We didn't copy-paste. We restructured.

I adopted Brad Frost's Atomic Design methodology to ensure the system was scalable. The principle: complex interfaces are built from small, reusable parts. If those parts are designed as a system, the whole system stays consistent as it grows.

Step 01

Atoms

Foundations

Tokenized the basics: color styles, typography ramp, grid systems, spacing, and vertical rhythm. WCAG accessibility standards validated during the color audit.

Step 02

Molecules

Building blocks

Combining atoms into functional interactive elements: buttons with all states, input fields, form controls. Built with Variants and Auto Layout.

Step 03

Organisms

Components

Assembling complex UI patterns: Audience Page Banners, Global Alert Banners, Card Decks, Content Image Banners. Full sections of the product, each composed from the same atomic building blocks.

Process — Atoms
Step 01, the foundational work

Foundations as tokens.

The first move was tokenizing every visual primitive. Color became a token library, every shade documented, named, and tied to accessibility ratings. Typography became a ramp with defined sizes, line-heights, and use cases across desktop, tablet, mobile, PowerPoint, and email.

This was the unsexy foundational work, but it's what makes everything else above it stay consistent. A brand color update now propagates across the entire system automatically. No more "which Unum blue is the right blue?"

Unum design system token library — typography ramp and color palette
WCAG 2.1 AA contrast audit — pass/fail grid for every color pairing
Process — Accessibility
Built into the tokens, not bolted on at the end

Every token, WCAG validated.

Accessibility was not a checklist at the end. As I built the color token library, I validated every contrast pairing against WCAG 2.1 AA. I documented which combinations pass for body text, which pass for large text, and which fail entirely.

For a regulated industry, accessibility isn't optional. It's a legal requirement. Encoding it into the tokens themselves means designers downstream can't accidentally ship something non-compliant.

Process — Molecules
Step 02, the component I am proudest of

Components with variants.

The button system is the one I'm proudest of. The old system had multiple button styles floating around product teams with no clear rules for when to use which. I consolidated them into a single component with variants for hierarchy (primary, secondary, tertiary), state (default, hover, focus, disabled), and size, all tied to color and spacing tokens.

Auto Layout meant the button resized cleanly with any label. After rollout, the dev team told me they cut button-related tickets significantly because the implementation rules were unambiguous.

Button component variants — hierarchy, state, and Auto Layout matrix
Composed UI organisms — banners, card decks, and anatomy view
Process — Organisms
Step 03, where it all came together

Composed UI patterns.

With atoms and molecules in place, organisms were the payoff. Audience Page Banners, Global Alert Banners, Card Decks, Content Image Banners. Full sections of the product, each composed from the same atomic building blocks.

Every organism was documented inside Figma with usage notes. Do's and Don'ts written into the component descriptions themselves. The system wasn't just files. It was instructions on how to use them.

The migration

From scattered PDFs to a single source of truth.

The migration from Adobe XD wasn't a 1:1 transfer. It required rebuilding components using Figma's modern features, Auto Layout, Variants, and Variables, to ensure the system was responsive, scalable, and maintainable.

— Before
Before — legacy Adobe XD type ramp document, drifted out of sync

A static PDF brand guideline plus working Adobe XD files that drifted out of sync. Designers reinvented the wheel. Developer handoff required manual specs. Updates didn't propagate.

— After
After — living Figma component library with documentation inside the component

A living Figma library with tokens, variants, and Auto Layout. Documentation lives inside the component. Naming matches the code repo. Updates propagate everywhere, automatically.

The rollout, the human side

A technical rollout is a culture change in disguise.

The hardest part of the migration wasn't the tooling. It was the people. Our development team had been at Unum for years and was deeply embedded in the existing workflow. They pushed back hard on adopting the new system because they saw it as a disruption, not improvement.

So the project pivoted. I hosted working sessions, walked developers through the long-term time savings component-by-component, upskilled junior designers so the system had champions beyond me, and framed every conversation around what engineering would gain.

"Path of least resistance is the path adoption follows. Build it, then teach it. Both, every day."

Outcome & impact

Measurable shifts in how the team worked.

Beyond the new files: faster shipping, cleaner handoffs, and a shared language between design and engineering that didn't exist before.

Outcome 01

Speed to market.

Prototyping new screens became significantly faster. What used to take hours in XD now took minutes by dragging and dropping pre-made Figma components.

Outcome 02

Single source of truth.

We eliminated the "where is the latest logo?" Slack messages. Everyone, designers, devs, and marketing, knew exactly where to look.

Outcome 03

Developer parity.

By naming Figma components to match the code repo (standardizing "Hero Banner" or "Icon List"), we reduced confusion during handoff and shared a common vocabulary.

Outcome 04

Adoption beyond me.

Junior designers were upskilled to use the system independently. The team shifted from resistant to actively requesting new components.

Lessons learned

What this taught me about systems work.

The technical lessons matter, but the cultural ones matter more. They're the ones I'd carry forward into any design systems team.

Lesson 01

Governance is the hard part.

Building the system is the easy part. Maintaining it is hard. We needed a clear process for who is allowed to change a component or add a new one. Without it, the system fragments fast.

"A library nobody uses correctly doesn't serve the team."

Lesson 02

Tools shape culture.

Switching to Figma unlocked collaboration features Adobe XD didn't provide at the time: multiplayer editing, inline comments, dev mode. The tool change literally changed how we worked together.

"The tool is not the system. But the right tool makes the system possible."

Lesson 03

Adoption is not creation.

Half the job of leading a design system is education and evangelism. Working sessions, 1:1s, async support. I treated system adoption as part of my job, not just system creation.

"Path of least resistance is the path adoption follows."

End of case study
Thanks for reading.
← View all case studies